I heard a pretty distressing news story this week. Apparently one TSA (the airport security people) employee just assaulted another one. Why? The second one had been teasing the first about the size of his penis after seeing it in a staff training demonstration of new security equipment. The story is here.
I’ll let you sit with this one for a second. They were testing new airport security scanner equipment that is able to look through your clothing and actually see what your genitalia look like. The idea is, eventually, to replace or augment existing scanners with these machines in airports. Perhaps more disturbingly, these machines have been in major airports since 2007. According to this Fox News article, written this past December, they’re already used in six airports as the primary type of scanner. Call me old fashioned and prude, but I’d have liked to know about these machines before they were installed, not after.
I’m an avid reader of science fiction. This is the type of stuff that I’m used to seeing in books. Loss of privacy being sacrificed for the good of the city state? Big Brother is always watching? Par for the course, if you’re painting a picture of a totalitarian regime of the future. But in real life? This stuff isn’t supposed to happen.
For me as a trans person, this becomes all the more terrifying. See, my mind always goes to the worst case scenario. And the worst case scenario, the one that I’ve been playing over in my head repeatedly all day since hearing about this, is as follows: I show up to the airport security area, dutifully remove my shoes, belt, laptop, liquids, watch and ipod. They go into one box. I walk into another one—the new scanner. The way it’ll work is that one person will be scanning me while another, remotely, watches the images and then gives the person scanning me the ‘all clear.’ The idea is that the person looking me in the eye isn’t the same one looking at my proverbial balls.
That’s the problem, though. I’ve got none, and this scanner will be able to show that. That in itself makes me uncomfortable. But what makes me more uncomfortable is the possibility that the person watching the images will say to the person scanning me something along the lines of “She’s fine,” or “You can clear her.” And the person scanning me will pause for a moment. They’ll look at me again, maybe call back to the person watching pictures and say “No, you don’t understand. You must be looking at the wrong picture.” Or they won’t, but they’ll look at me with a smirk of knowing, one that says everything they’re thinking.
Is this an issue of privacy? Yes. But for trans folks, it’s more than that. It’s an incredibly potent issue of safety. I can imagine a scenario where an incident like that happens, except the person looking at me or any other trans person is a huge homophobe. A homophobe who considers it their duty to inform me of the rules I’ve transgressed. These people exist, and I’m not so naïve as to think they don’t exist in airport security. I don’t know whether I’ll ever run into one such officer of the law, but I know that trans people as a group will, and it’s scary to think about what comes next.
I get the need for security. I get that terrorism is a threat and there are weapons that aren’t detected by the regular scanners. And I get that airports need to be hyper vigilant to protect the folks flying. I agree with all that. But I don’t agree with the actions towards those goals that the people running the airports have made. I don’t agree with the whole hog sacrifice of everyone’s right to show their body to only the people they’ve chosen, not a random TSA employee. And while I agree that we all need to make sacrifices for the safety of our country, I’m not okay with the safety of trans people in this country being a sacrifice that is unacknowledged but is all too real. Terrorism or not, putting such an unwelcome, disproportionate burden on trans folks isn’t okay, and I don’t buy that this is the only way to guarantee safety. We can do better, and we must.




mivox
As I understand it, airports using the scanners will be offering pat-downs as an alternative for folks who don’t like the idea of security seeing them naked. Either way, I think it’s an utterly absurd invasion of privacy, but a pat down + a Mr. Softee or somesuch would probably help reduce the specific concerns you mention.
.-= mivox´s last blog ..mivox: In the biggest sense, environmental education means learning to maintain a balanced way of life. /via@DalaiLama =-.
Gabe
Yeah, it definitely would, and that’s what I’ll probably end up doing, should I find myself in such airports. But even that is a situation that bears added risk for trans folks for harassment, so it’s not a perfect solution. But, agreed, it’s definitely better!
Splendwhore
What a complete and utter invasion of privacy! I so do not want some security guard checkin’ out my hooha, let alone giving it the “All clear”.
Gabe
Agreed!
Champagne and Benzedrine
Funnily enough, I’d recently been involved in a heated debate about trans issues and airport security – when blogger Butchtastic Kyle got some poor treatment at the hands of TSA operatives because he was ‘packing’ as he went through airport security.
I argued that deliberately packing, knowing in advance that it would cause an issue at airport security, wasn’t exactly a cool thing to do. I respect his right to pack, but that crazy bomber who snuck explosives on a plane in his underpants pretty much screwed it for everybody else who wants to pad their underwear with non-organic materials.
Whether you agree with Kyle or me, it is clear is that our airport screening isn’t stringent enough as it is, what with terrorists STILL seemingly being able to board planes carrying explosives.
These new scanners might seem like an invasion of privacy, but I think they’re just the tip of the iceberg; expect much worse to come. Only eventually will there be tipping point; when the majority of customers simply refuse to undergo these indignities.
We haven’t reached it yet; and until we do it’s people on the edges of what’s deemed socially ‘normal’ (like Gabe) who will feel the brunt of it.
.-= Champagne and Benzedrine´s last blog ..Flaming Bush =-.
Gabe
I would agree with you that it’s not an issue with an easy or clear right answer. The balance between safety and rights (to privacy, to not being harassed) is a hard one to strike, and is the undertone of all sorts of civil debates.
Since you brought up your debate with Butchtastic Kyle, I’ll throw my 2 cents out there, though I haven’t read that particular thread. I think that to put the onus on Kyle not to get harassed is really problematic. The issue here isn’t the trans people who are presenting in less common ways (e.g., a trans man without a traditional penis or packing a silicone one) but rather a system where TSA folks aren’t educated enough to know what’s going on and be professional about it. It’s true that Kyle might have been better off, as in, less harassed, if he’d chosen not to pack that day. But that’s not a fair burden to place on him and other trans folks, the same way that the burden should not be placed on anyone to not get sexually harassed, it should be placed on other folks to not harass.
As I said above, I agree with you that security measures need to intensify. I simply don’t agree with the decision to intensify them in ways that inconvenience and endanger one group more than others. And while it is true that trans folks will have some opportunity to minimize harassment, this sort of attitude forgets the all too important point that they have the right to be treated as all others are, even without taking on harassment minimization techniques). And if this is the tip of an ice berg, then it’s all the more important that we start changing our attitudes immediately.
Sir
Gabe, thank you for this post. I am glad that you wrote it.
.-= Sir´s last blog ..Another Contest? Yipee! =-.
Gabe
thanks for reading!
Darling Dove
I’m not sure how I feel about this.
I see where you are coming on this, but this is a safety and privacy issue for EVERYONE… not just trans people. Like I said, I see why it would be especially bothersome to you, but its an issue we all face, and everyone faces it uniquely.
I don’t see why it wouldn’t be more desirable to face it as one unified group- as fellow humans. Instead of focusing on the parts of the issue that differentiate us from each other. I guess that’s what I’m trying to say, but I’m sure I expressed myself poorly.
.-= Darling Dove´s last blog ..Pleasurists #74 =-.
Gabe
Hey Darling Dove-
You’re bringing up a really great point, and it’s one that I thought a lot about while writing this. And you expressed yourself well, so I hope that my response will be as coherent.
I think this is an issue that we, as fellow humans, should face together. I think that a trans person being harassed is an issue that is of human concern, in that the attitudes and standards surrounding gender and sex that lead to that harassment are in fact harmful to all people. Therefore, all people should be committed to fixing those attitudes/standards, and killing two birds with one stone–having healthier ideas about is okay for men and women to be, and protecting trans folks from harassment simultaneously.
With that said, I don’t think that this is an issue that affects all people equally, and though I hope that all people would care equally about it, to suggest that trans people aren’t disproportionately affected is to ignore reality. Yes, this is a privacy issue for everyone–a majority of us would prefer if we could control who looked at us naked. And yes, there is some safety issue for everyone–there’s always the chance that someone will be sexually harassed because of this new scanning procedure.
But where there is a slight chance for many people, there is a high chance for trans people. Regularly, so regularly it’s depressing to follow the statistics, trans people (particularly trans women) are beaten or murdered when it is revealed that they are trans. I don’t mean to prioritize one person’s oppression over another–there are issues of sexual harassment that cut across all demographics–but the pool of people who consider it acceptable to harass a trans person because that person doesn’t conform to gender standards is stupefying. We have an entire culture that feels deeply uncomfortable with gender nonconformity.
So is this an issue that everyone should care about and fight for together? Yes, ideally. But that doesn’t mean it affects everyone equally. It does, indeed, affect some people more than others, and it’s not just that trans folks face it “uniquely,” it’s that they face it more dramatically and more regularly than other groups.
Sarah
My wife who is transwoman just dealt with airport security for the first time since she began transitioning. It was a difficult situation and she complained of rude behavior along with her supervisor who witnessed the situation since they were on a trip to a conference. They are both putting in complaints.
.-= Sarah´s last blog ..Icicle, icicle, where are you going? =-.
Gabe
Hey Sarah-
i’m sorry your wife was treated badly, though I’m glad to hear, and grateful, that she’s putting in a complaint–Hopefully over time, the airlines will start to pay attention!
Al_Pal
Scary stuff. I somewhat foresee an uptick in train travel!
Glad you’re writing about this!